Gyanodaya - Centre for Pedagogical Innovation and Publishing IIMK

Pandulipi

Manuscript Management System

Pandulipi, derived from the Sanskrit word for "manuscript," embodies the essence of scholarly exchange and intellectual legacy. Designed as a dedicated portal for case submission, it fosters a culture of academic rigor, pedagogical innovation, and collaborative knowledge sharing. More than a repository, Pandulipi serves as a comprehensive guide for authors, detailing the entire publication journey for Gyanodaya. It offers clear guidance on the resources, processes, and best practices required to prepare and publish high-quality case studies and teaching notes. By exploring the resources available on the portal, authors can effectively develop impactful content that meets the academic and editorial standards of Gyanodaya, thereby contributing to a transformative impact on education and research.

Let’s Get Started!

Watch the video to explore the comprehensive three-stage review process of Gyanodaya.

If you already have account, please Login

Create your free Gyanodaya Account

Salutation

Name

Password(Minimum 6 characters)

Confirm Password

Type: Internal Faculty External Faculty

University where you currently affiliated

Phone

Area

OUR PUBLICATION JOURNEY

Gyanodaya is eager to publish submitted cases without compromising quality. However, we strive to make sure that

All case submissions are subjected to plagiarism screening through software licensed to IIM Kozhikode to ensure originality and academic integrity.
The submitted case and teaching note will be evaluated through a three-stage review process. Improvements to the case and teaching note may be requested before final acceptance for publication. Please refer to the video on the page at https://gyanodaya.iimk.ac.in/register for a detailed understanding of the review process.

Stage 1: Initial Quality Control and Formatting

The editorial team will ensure that each case study is based on a real company and a real issue; all documents are free from plagiarism and AI-generated content; proper source citations are provided; images and figures are of good quality and resolution; and that necessary permissions for reproducing copyrighted material, as well as consent (for primary cases), are duly obtained. This stage will be completed within 7 working days from the submission date and the author will be notified accordingly.

Stage 2: Assessment by Faculty Members

Your submission will be evaluated by two faculty reviewers with relevant subject matter expertise and provide quick feedback in the form of a rating on a five-point scale, where 5 is the highest. Cases scoring more than 3 will be automatically moved to stage III. The reviewer will evaluate the relevance of the content, complexity of the decision-making dilemma discussed, coverage of the case, depth of the teaching note, proposed teaching plan, consistency and professionalism in the presentation of the case, and writing style.

Stage 3: Double- Blind Review

One expert reviewer evaluates the case study and teaching note based on various editorial criteria. When reviewing a case study, the reviewer guarantees that it uses neutral language, maintains suspense, presents complexity, is action-driven, and remains ambiguous without sacrificing clarity. The case should also be concise and clearly written. In assessing a teaching note, the reviewer considers the context, discussion plan, instructional guidance, and integration of relevant concepts